| FARM BUREAU ARREST POLICYHOLDER On October 10, 2007 at about 4:20 PM. I arrived at Farm Bureau headquarters in Jefferson City, Mo. I drove around the building and grounds in the Farm Bureaumobile for a few minutes, then parked in the visitor parking lot. Upon entering the building I ask the receptionist if I could see Charles Kruse. The receptionist was very cordial and called Mr. Kruse. She advised me that he was in a meeting and had another meeting after that one. I ask what time I should come back in the morning. She said people started coming in around eight. On October 11, 2007 the following morning I returned, and was met by Mr. Dana Frese, a Farm Bureau Lawyer. Upon failing to get an appointment to meet with Mr. Kruse I left the Headquarters and went to an appointment at the Supreme Court Building in downtown Jefferson City. I later arrived at my motel where I found a State Highway Patrolman, and a Cole County Deputy Sheriff searching the Farm Bureaumobile. As I approached, a Jefferson City Police Officer placed me under arrest for disturbing the peace, handcuffed me, and took me to the city jail where I was booked. I was then transported to the Cole County Jail where I posted bond, and was released.
(Bond documents received from Sheriff on October 11, 2007) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI JUDGE SODERGREN, DlV 3 Defendant's Name, Gash, Maurice Lynn 981 Owl Creek Park Way Odessa, MO 64076 Next Court Hearing: November 30, 2007 AT 0900 DlV 3 Bond Amount: Bond Received: $500.00 CASH Charges ): Peace Dist.
On November 1, 2007 I received this letter from Farm Bureau. MISSOURI FARM BUREAU FEDERATION P.O. Box 658, 701 South Country Club Drive. Jefferson City, MO 65102 / (573) 893-1400 October 29,2007 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Maurice L. Gash 981 Owl Creek Parkway Odessa, Missouri 64076 Dear Mr. Gash, You were advised during your recent entry upon the premises of the Farm Bureau home office in Jefferson City that the individuals you wished to speak with had no interest in visiting with you and that there was no need for you to be on the premises. Despite that notification, you indicated that you were going to return to the property. Please interpret this letter as written notice that you, or anyone acting on your behalf, are not permitted to enter any premises owned or possessed by Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Missouri Farm Bureau Services, Inc., Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Company of Missouri, Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company of Missouri or any county Missouri Farm Bureau. These properties include, but are not limited to, the following: Missouri Farm Bureau home office 701 S. Country Club Drive Jefferson City, Missouri Lafayette County Farm Bureau office 201A North 2nd Street Odessa, Missouri Any entry by you, or on your behalf, on these premises is non-permissive and shall be considered a violation of Section 569.140 of the Missouri Revised Statutes and all applicable local and municipal ordinances. Should you choose to disregard this notice and further intrude upon these premises, expect and anticipate that all legal rights will be asserted and all legal remedies, both civil and criminal, will be sought against you or anyone acting on your behalf. Dan Cassidy Chief Administrative Officer
On November 28, 2007 I received this letter from Tan-Tar-A Tan-Tar-A Resort GOLF CLUB, MARINA & INDOOR WATERPARK Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested November 26, 2007 Maurice L. Gash 981 Owl Creek Parkway Odessa, MO 64076 Dear Mr. Gash: Based on previous incidents that have occurred involving you and the Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, be advised that you will not be allowed on the property of Tan- Tar-A Resort during the upcoming Missouri Farm Bureau Annual Meeting, scheduled for December 1 through December 5, 2007. This request includes both your physical presence and/or property, to include vehicles, trailers, etc. Your reservation at Tan- Tar-A Resort has been cancelled at no expense to you, for the dates of December 1 through December 3, 2007. Any visit by you, or on your behalf over these dates to Tan- Tan-A Resort will be considered trespassing, and we will respond accordingly with local law enforcement. Sincerely, Fred Dehner General Manager
On November 30, 2007 I appeared in Cole County Circuit Court as ordered. The case was continued to January 11, 2008.
(Continuance document received at my hearing on November 30, 2007) CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE CO. CRIMINAL DOCKET MISDEMEANOR APPEARANCE ORDER State vs. MAURICE L GASH Case No. Charge: PEACE DISTURBANCE Date: 11/30/07 ACTION State appears by APA Defendant appears in person Case continued to 1/11/08
On November 30, 2007 I went to the Jefferson City Police Dept. and requested copies of the police report, the arresting officers field notes, and a copy of the 911 call to police requesting assistance. On December 12, 2007 I received the following police report. JEFFERSON CITY MISSOURI POLICE DEPT
Offense Report # 1-07-007813 10/11/07 8:00 THURSDAY FARM BUREAU, 701 S JEFFERSON CITY, MO COLE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE BUILDING Report Officer AMBLER, JASON 0/00/00 SHELLMAN, MICHAEL 10/22/07 KILGORE, CARLA 11/30/07 Case Number . : 1-07-007813 Dept Class .. : DISTURBANCE/BUSINESS Case Status . : REFERRED TO PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Case Status Dt : 10/11/07 Forwarded To Investigator. : AMBLER, J. Actions? .. Ticklers? PERSON REP0RTING OFFENSE Last Name .. : CASSIDY, DANIEL L Street Number : 701 S COUNTRY CLUB City : JEFFERSON CITY, MO County : COLE Business Phone : 573/893-1404 Social Security: xxxxxxxxxxxxx Race .... : WHITE Occupation .. : VICE PRESIDENT/FARM BUREAU SUSPECT / ARRESTEE INFORMATION GASH, MAURICE LYNN 981 OWL CREEK PKWY ODESSA, MO 64076 Home Phone No. : 816/633-4344 Social Security: xxxxxxxxxxxx Race ..... : WHITE RETIRED INVESTIGATIVE NARRATIVE Reported By: AMBLER, JASON A. 10/11/07 Entered By.: SHELLMAN, MICHAEL 10/22/07 Reviewed By: KILGORE, CARLA A. 11/30/07
On 10/11/07 at 0837 hrs., I responded to Farm Bureau at 701 South Country Club Drive, in reference to a disturbance that had occurred. Upon arrival I made contact with Dan Cassidy, the vice president of Farm Bureau, who informed me on today's date that at approximately 0800 hrs., an individual known to him as Maurice Gash, a customer of theirs who is aggravated with the company, came to the business wishing to speak to the president of Farm Bureau, Charlie Kruse. Dan backed up his statement in informing that this individual also had a website proclaiming his dislike for Farm Bureau and informed me the website: Farrnbureaulies.com. At that time Dan invited into their conference center so that we could sit down and conduct an interview reference everything that occurred. Dan stated on 10/10/07 at approximately 1630 hrs., the defendant, Maurice Gash, showed up at 701 South Country Club Drive, Farm Bureau, in a white Dodge mini-van, that has signs allover it showing his hate for Farm Bureau. I asked Dan where this hate originates from and he stated it comes from a claim on 07/09/03 for a fire that happened at his house. Farm Bureau felt that this was not a valid claim based on not providing proper paperwork which was requested by the insurance company at that time. Dan then provided me with a copy of the court actions regarding this case and the breach of contract. Dan stated it was set to go to trial and it was settled on the date of the trial on the steps of the courthouse. Dan stated that Maurice Gash at a later, decided that this wasn't enough money and the judge had to sign a court order stating he could not pursue this any further in an attempt to take Farm Bureau back to court. Dan stated that Maurice has continued since this date, driving around to various Farm Bureau county offices with this vehicle, proclaiming his dislike but has never come onto any Farm Bureau property until today. Dan stated on 10/10/07 he showed up wanting to speak with Charlie Kruse, the Farm Bureau president, wanting answers regarding this act. Dan stated that Maurice Gash spoke with Bruce Bruemmer, a representative of the business and was told that no one was available. On 10/11/07 at 0800 hrs., Maurice showed back up and was contacted by Dana Frese, the attorney for Farm Bureau. Dana approached him in the parking lot and the suspect stated that he did not have to speak with him, an~ this did not concern him, and walked into the building. Maurice was contacted again in the lobby and stated he wanted to speak with the president of Fdrm Bureau. At that time Dana again told him that lithe president does not wish to see you". At that time Maurice became adamant and informed Dana that, III'm a member". Dana then asked him what member business he wanted to transact that brought him to the Jefferson City office, and Maurice was not able to answer this question. Maurice made the remark that he would be back in a couple of hours and stated he had other business in town to attend to. At that time I was given access to look at Maurice's website and he states in his website that he was in the town of Jefferson City, Missouri on 10/11/07 to have an argument of his heard in front of the Missouri Supreme Court. At that time I contacted the U.S. Marshall Service and informed them of what I was working on and asked them to possibly attempt to locate this subject at the Supreme Court. There was no luck with the U.S. Marshall Service being able to locate the suspect at that time. I put out an attempt to locate on the vehicle for peace disturbance because Dan also informed me that he is scared the suspect may come back and create some type of physical injury towards staff and they put the building on lock-down because this disturbance has scared all the employees in believing that violence is eminent. At approximately 1115 hrs., the suspect vehicle was located at 4804 Country Club Drive, Candlewood Suites, a hotel in Jefferson City. I was also able to contact the suspect and his attorney in the parking lot of the business. I introduced myself to Mr. Gash. Mr. Gash was also informed of his Miranda Rights and he stated he understood them and would speak with me. Also standing with Mr. Gash and I was his attorney, Jim Rust. Maurice informed me that his intentions were not to scare anyone, he just wanted to speak to the president of the company about his dislike for their business practices. At that time I informed Maurice he was under arrest for peace disturbance and I transported him to the Jefferson City Police Department for processing. While at the police department I informed him that his presence at Farm Bureau was no longer welcome and that if he returned to the business he would be arrested for trespassing. Maurice assured me that he understood and would not return. The subject was taken to the Cole County Jail where he was allowed to post bond. This report will be forwarded to the prosecuting attorney's office. Nothing further. ATTACHED IN FILE Reported By: AMBLER, JASON A. 10/11/07 Entered By.: BECK, JANNA 10/12/07 Attached in file: warrant application, probable cause statement, statement of rights * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * END OF REPORT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On December 15, 2007 I sent this letter requesting more data from the Jefferson City Police Department. 12/15/2007 From: Maurice Gash, 981 Owl Creek Parkway. Odessa, Mo. 64076 816-682-2838 To: Jefferson City Police Department, Records Dept. Ref: Complaint #7007813 date of arrest 10/11/2007 I received the copies you sent on 12/12/07, but the officers field notes, and a copy, or Transcript of the 911 call was not included. I had requested those items on my request form on 11/30/07. Would you please provide those to me as soon as possible? In addition, I would like copies of the Warrant application, probable cause statement, and statement of rights. Please call with the charges and I will send another money order. Sincerely, Maurice Gash
On January 3, 2008 I received this letter from the Jefferson City Police Department concerning arrest records. December 31, 2007 City of Jefferson 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Mr. Maurice Gash 981 Owl Creek Parkway Odessa MO 64076 RE: Request for Police records John Landwehr Mayor Phyllis Powell City Clerk Phone: (573) 634-6311 Fax: (573) 634-6329 Dear Mr. Gash, I am writing in regarding to your requests for Jefferson City Police records on November 30,2007, December 5,2007, and December 15, 2007. I am enclosing copies of the above-mentioned requests submitted which shows that "911 call" was not included on any of the three requests. However, if the 911 call had been requested, the City would not be able to release that record pursuant to RSMo 610.150 as it is considered a "closed record" by state statute. All records which pertain to your arrest were released pursuant to your first two requests. If you have questions regarding this response, please call me at (573) 634-6311. Sincerely, Phyllis Powell, City Clerk Custodian of Records City of Jefferson, MO cc: Law Department Police Department
On January 11, 2008 I appeared in Cole County Circuit Court pertaining to my arrest by Farm Bureau for disturbing the peace. The Judge returned my bond money, and said I need not return. The Circuit Clerk said the Prosecutor had nine more months to file charges against me, " go home and wait." I'm at home waiting and wondering if they will actually file charges on the basis of Dan Cassidy and Farm Bureaus false report to the police. On March 13, 2008 I went to the Cole County Prosecutors office and ask an investigator there by the name of Herb Heinen if they were going to prosecute me over this arrest for peace disturbance. He said another investigator had reviewed the case and decided not to prosecute. I voiced my desire to have the arrest removed from my record. He stated he would send me a letter tomorrow on the office letterhead stating that I would not be prosecuted. He advised me where at the State Highway Patrol my record was kept. On April 2, 2008 I received Mr. Herb Heinens letter on the Cole County Prosecutors letterhead. It will be of no use in getting the record of my arrest removed because he cleverly added the words "at the present time" in reference to if they will prosecute me or not. So in essence I am still waiting out the remaining seven months of their time limit to actually prosecute me. June 23, 2008 I'm still on hold in this arrest situation, giving some thought to the options available to me. July 24, 2008 I'm still on hold, and decideing on what option I will take next over this false arrest, and illegal search of the Farm Bureaumobile.
September 14, 2008 I'm still on hold. October 1, 2008 Only ten more days and the year time limit will be up on the possibility of Farm Bureau being successful in getting me rearrested. October 7, 2008 Farm Bureau now has 3 days left to have me rearrested on the bogus accusation that I committed Peace Disturbance at their offices in Jefferson City, Mo. They instigated my arrest nearly a year ago in an attempt to force me and the Farm Bureaumobile out of Jefferson City, and away from their office building. They did force me out of town, but in so doing they used tactics that were very unfair to me, and illegal. I have been weighing my options over this unfair treatment from Farm Bureau and have decided that if they fail to rearrest me and re-prosecute me for what they accused me of last October 11, it is an indication that the accusations were bogus, and they knew it all along. They didn't seem to mind making me suffer through this last nine months not knowing if I would be rearrested or not. I see a corrolation in the way they treated me and the way they treat their policyholders who make claims. Farm Bureau makes their accusations that the policyholders committed some sort of violation of the policy so they can deny it. then they delay the claim so long that the policyholder is forced to accept a lowball settlement offer. Farm Bureau never has to actually prove their accusations in court. October 10, 2008 I will continue this posting Saturday morning if Farm Bureau doesn't have me back in jail again. October 12, 08 Well, I won't be rearrested now because their one year time limit is over. I have now filed a federal lawsuit against Farm Bureau and others for my false arrest, I will post the progress and documentation of this suit as time goes by. The False Arrest Petition IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY MAURICE L. GASH, ) 981 Owl Creek Parkway ) Odessa, Missouri 64076 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 2:08-cv- ) 04245-SOW v. ) ) SHERIFF GREG WHITE, Sheriff of Cole ) County Missouri in both his ) official capacity and his individual capacity ) P.O. Box 426 311 E. High St. ) JURY TRIAL Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 ) DEMANDED
)
and ) ) COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI )
[SERVE: Cole County Clerk ) P.O. Box 426 311 E. High St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65101] ) ) and ) ) JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN COLE COUNTY )
DEPUTY SHERIFF, ) in both his official capacity and his individual ) capacity ) [SERVE: Cole County Sheriff )
P.O. Box 426 311 E. High St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65101] ) ) and ) ) ROGER A. SCHROEDER, Police Chief of ) Jefferson City, Missouri, in both his official )
capacity and his individual capacity ) 401 Monroe St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 ) )
and ) ) CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI ) 401 Monroe St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 ) ) and ) ) JASON AMBLER, Jefferson City, Missouri ) Police Officer, in both his official capacity and ) his individual capacity ) 401 Monroe St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 ) ) and )
)
MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ) 1510 E. Elm St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 ) ) and ) ) James F. Keathley, Superintendent, Missouri ) State Highway Patrol, in both his official capacity ) and his individual capacity ) 1510 E. Elm St. ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 ) )
and ) ) JOHN DOE # 2, UNKNOWN MISSOURI )
STATE HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICER, ) in both his official capacity and his individual ) capacity ) [SERVE: Missouri State Highway Patrol ) 1510 E. Elm St. )
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 ) ) and ) ) MISSOURI FARM BUREAU FEDERATION )
a/k/a MISSOURI FARM BUREAU )
FEDERATION % ) 701 Country Club Drive ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 ) ) and ) ) CHARLES KRUSE, President of Missouri ) Farm Bureau Federation ) 1007 Woodland Drive ) Dexter, Missouri 63841 ) ) and ) ) MISSOURI FARM BUREAU INSURANCE )
SERVICES a/k/a MISSOURI FARM BUREAU )
FAMILY OF COMPANIES, a/k/a MISSOURI )
FARM BUREAU INSURANCE, a/k/a )
MISSOURI FARM BUREAU FAMILY OF ) INSURANCE COMPAINES ) 701 Country Club Drive ) Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 ) ) and ) ) DANIEL CASSIDY, Chief Adm. Officer, ) of Missouri Farm Bureau Federation ) 3853 County Road 257 ) Fulton, Missouri 65251 ) SERVE: DANIEL CASSIDY, Registered Agent ) ) Defendants. )
COMPLAINT (Violation of Civil Rights, Intentional Torts and Negligence)
Plaintiff Maurice L. Gash demands a jury trial on all claims stated in this Complaint. For his causes of action against Cole County Sheriff Greg White, Cole County Missouri, John Doe unknown Cole County Deputy Sheriff, Roger A. Schroeder Jefferson City Police Chief, City of Jefferson City Missouri, Jason Ambler Jefferson City Missouri Police Officer, Missouri State Highway Patrol, James F. Keathley Superintendent Missouri State Highway Patrol, John Doe # 2 unknown Missouri State Highway Patrol Officer, Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse President of Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, Daniel Cassidy Chief Administrative Officer of Missouri Farm Bureau Federation. (referred to below as “Defendants”), Plaintiff Maurice L. Gash states as follows:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION 1. This civil rights action is brought by Plaintiff Maurice L. Gash for monetary damages for the violation of his civil rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America. Plaintiff Gash also seeks damages for supplemental state claims of false arrest, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. 2. On October 10, 2007 Mr. Gash visited the Farm Bureau Offices at 701 Country Club Drive, Jefferson City, Missouri. Mr. Gash requested an appointment with Mr. Charles Kruse, the President of Farm Bureau. The receptionist advised Mr. Gash that Mr. Kruse was busy in meetings the rest of the afternoon. The receptionist arranged for Mr. Gash to meet with Bruce Bruemmer from the claims dept. She also advised Mr. Gash that Mr. Kruse would arrive the next day around 8:00 am. Mr. Gash stated that he would return the next morning to see Mr. Kruse, or get an appointment. The receptionist showed Mr. Gash how to lock up if she was gone after his meeting with Mr. Bruemmer. 3. Mr. Gash returned the next morning at approximately 8:00 AM. Mr. Gash was met in the visitor parking lot by Farm Bureau attorney Dana Frese who told Mr. Gash “I know all about what you’re doing” and then asked Mr. Gash what his business was at Farm Bureau. Mr. Gash advised Mr. Frese that his business was with Mr. Charles Kruse and proceeded into the office building. When Mr. Gash asked the receptionist if he could meet with Mr. Kruse, Mr. Dana Frese interrupted the conversation by trying to get Mr. Gash to talk to him instead. Mr. Gash insisted on seeing only Mr. Kruse. Mr. Gash having another appointment at 9:00 am that morning advised the receptionist that he would return later to try again to see, or get an appointment with Mr. Kruse. Mr. Gash then left the building and returned to his motel and met with his attorney to prepare for a court appearance at the Missouri State Supreme Court at 9:00 am. 4. At approximately 11:00 am as Mr. Gash and his attorney arrived back at his motel he observed a Missouri State Highway Patrolman, and a Cole County Deputy Sheriff in the process of searching the inside of his vehicle that was parked at his motel. As Mr. Gash and his attorney approached the vehicle Jefferson City Missouri Police Officer Jason Ambler placed Mr. Gash under arrest for peace disturbance, put him in handcuffs, and locked him in his patrol car in full view of all motel employees and other guests. Mr. Ambler then transported Mr. Gash to the police station where he was booked and fingerprinted, and locked up in a small holding cell. Mr. Ambler then told Mr. Gash that he was not welcome at Farm Bureau and advised Mr. Gash to not return there with his vehicle ever again. Mr. Gash posted $500.00 cash bond at the Cole County Sheriff’s Office, and was released with a court hearing set for November 30, 2007. 5. Mr. Gash subsequently made two court appearances, on November 30, 2007, and January 11, 2008. At the last court appearance Judge Thomas Sodergren advised Mr. Gash that he did not have to return to his court in connection with this case, and ordered him to report to the Circuit Clerks office. The Circuit Clerk advised Mr. Gash that the Prosecutor had one year to file charges in this case, and for Mr. Gash to “go home and wait”. To obtain his release and to prepare to defend the criminal charges which to this date have never been filed, because the Prosecutor found no probable cause, Mr. Gash has incurred substantial legal fees, and transportation cost. 6. Mr. Gash now seeks damages for the Defendants’ reckless, intentional and conspiratorial actions that violated his civil rights, restrained his liberty, damaged his reputation, and which humiliated him in front of his attorney and various guests at the motel at which he was staying and which inflicted enormous mental suffering and pain. JURISDICTION
7. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1343, which provides for original jurisdiction of this Court in suits authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to redress the deprivation under color of state law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage of any right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States. 8. Plaintiff further invokes the supplemental jurisdiction of this Court to hear and decide claims arising under state law. 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
9. Plaintiff’s actions for damages are authorized by: 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides for redress for the deprivation under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage of any state or territory of any rights, privileges or immunities secured to all the citizens or persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; – The Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; – the law of the state of Missouri; and – 42 U.S.C. § 1988, which authorizes Plaintiff’s application for attorneys’ fees and provides that a court may award a reasonable attorneys’ fee as part of costs in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 10. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2), as the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in Cole County, Missouri. THE PARTIES
11. Plaintiff Maurice L. Gash is and was, at all times relevant to this complaint, a citizen of Odessa, Lafayette County Missouri. He now resides at 981 Owl Creek Parkway, Odessa, Missouri 64076. 12. The Defendant governmental entities were created by, and established
under, the laws of the State of Missouri. They are authorized to sue or be sued in their corporate names. They have also purchased one or more policies of insurance which would provide their employees with coverage for some or all of Plaintiff’s claims. The individual Defendant employees of the aforementioned government entities, at all times relevant to the conduct alleged in this Complaint, were sworn law enforcement officers in the State of Missouri. They are sued in their individual and official capacities. 13. The Defendant, government entities and their Defendant employees at all times material to this Complaint, were acting under color of state law. 14. The Defendant Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Bureau Insurance Services are also registered with the Missouri Secretary of State in numerous registrations and fictitious names including Missouri Farm Bureau Federation %, Missouri Farm Bureau Family of Companies, Missouri Farm Bureau Family of Insurance Companies, Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance, and some are private corporations and some are nonprofit corporations , all were created by and established under the laws of the State of Missouri. They are authorized to sue or be sued in their corporate names. The individual Defendant employees of the aforementioned Defendant private corporations, at all times relevant to the conduct alleged in this Complaint, were employees of said corporations and are responsible for their own actions and the corporation is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
15. On October 10, 2007, Plaintiff Maurice L. Gash resided at 981 Owl Creek Parkway, Odessa, Missouri with his wife Nancy L. Gash. On the afternoon of October 10, 2007 Mr. Gash drove from his home to Jefferson City, Missouri in his personal Dodge vehicle for the purpose of meeting with Charles Kruse, the President of Missouri Farm Bureau Federation. Mr. Gash was conducting a campaign to convince Farm Bureau to change their ongoing practice of denying certain insurance claims filed by their members. Mr. Gash used his vehicle as an advertizing tool to promote his website, FarmBureauLies.com which acts as an advocate for policy holders in Missouri who received unfair claims treatment from Farm Bureau Insurance. 16. Defendant Jason Ambler was an officer of the Jefferson City Police Department. During the events in question he was under the supervision of Jefferson City Police Chief Roger A. Schroeder. 17. Defendant John Doe (unknown Cole County Deputy Sheriff) was an officer of the Cole County Sheriffs Department. During the events in question he was under the supervision of Cole County Sheriff Greg White.
18. Defendant John Doe #2 (unknown Missouri State Highway Patrolman) was an officer of the Missouri State Highway Patrol. During the events in question he was under the supervision of James F. Keathley, Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol. 19. Acting on false, malicious, misleading and unverified information provided by Dan Cassidy, Chief Administrative Officer of Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Officers Jason Ambler, John Doe unknown Cole County Deputy, and John Doe #2 Unknown Missouri Highway Patrolman located Plaintiffs vehicle legally parked in the guest parking lot at 4804 Country Club Drive, Candlewood Suites, the motel where Plaintiff was staying. The motel is located in Cole County, beyond the Jefferson City limits. At about 11:00 am the aforementioned officers conducted a search of Plaintiffs vehicle without his permission, or a legal search warrant, and instigated the seizure of Mr. Gash’s vehicle by summoning a tow truck to remove the vehicle from where it was legally parked at Mr. Gash’s motel. 20. At approximately 11:00 am as Mr. Gash and his attorney arrived back at his motel from a hearing at the Missouri Supreme Court he observed the search of his vehicle in progress. As Mr. Gash and his attorney approached the vehicle Jefferson City Missouri Police Officer Jason Ambler placed Mr. Gash under arrest for peace disturbance without producing a legal arrest warrant, or conducting any further investigation with Mr. Gash, or his Attorney to verify the accuracy of Defendant Farm Bureau and Defendant Cassidy’s false, malicious, misleading, and unverified statements and accusations as to what had actually occurred earlier that morning at the offices of Farm Bureau. Defendant Jason Ambler chose to rely solely on the false, misleading, and malicious information provided by Defendant Cassidy. He then placed Plaintiff Gash under arrest and read Mr. Gash his Miranda Rights, put him in handcuffs, and locked him in his patrol car in full view of all motel employees and other guest. 21. While Plaintiff was handcuffed and locked in the police car a tow truck arrived to seize Plaintiffs vehicle. Defendant Jason Ambler cancelled the seizure of Plaintiffs vehicle and sent the tow truck away. 22. Mr. Ambler then transported Mr. Gash to the police station where he was booked and fingerprinted, and locked up in a small holding cell. Mr. Ambler then told Mr. Gash that he was not welcome at Farm Bureau and advised Mr. Gash to not return there with his vehicle ever again. Mr. Gash was then transported to the Cole County Jail where he posted $500.00 cash bond and was released with a court hearing set for November 30, 2007. 23. Plaintiff Gash appeared for a hearing in Cole County Circuit Court on November 30, 2007. Cole County Prosecutor Mark A. Richardson continued the case to January 11,2008. 24. Plaintiff Gash appeared for hearing in Cole County Circuit Court on January 11, 2008. Circuit Court Judge Thomas Sodergren ordered plaintiffs bond returned and directed Plaintiff Gash to not return to his court concerning this arrest for Peace Disturbance. 25. On March 31, 2008 Herb Heinen an Investigator from the Cole County Prosecutors Office advised Plaintiff Gash that his office would not file charges against Plaintiff for Peace Disturbance at that particular time, thus subjecting Mr. Gash to eight more months of fear, anxiety, anguish and mental suffering because of the possibility of being arrested and prosecuted again. 26. As a result of the seizure of his person, false arrest, illegal search, malicious prosecution, and months of apprehension not knowing if charges would be filed and another arrest perpetrated on him by Defendants. Mr. Gash has experienced overwhelming fear and emotional distress both at the time of the incident, and in the months since. To defend the charges against him which were never filed, he has incurred substantial legal fees and transportation cost. 27. All of the Defendants knew or should have known that their conduct violated clearly established constitutional or statutory rights of which a reasonable person should have known. 28. All actions by the Defendant governmental entities were taken under color of state law. Count I Claim Against All Defendants for Unconstitutional Search and Seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-28 and further states as follows: 29. Defendants John Doe, Jason Ambler, and John Doe #2, acting under color of state law, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, reached an understanding, acted in concert and engaged in a course of conduct together, and otherwise conspired among and between themselves to deprive Mr. Gash of his rights under the United States Constitution. Defendants intentionally and/or recklessly searched Plaintiffs vehicle without a search warrant issued by a judge or magistrate. The search was illegal, unconstitutional and unreasonable, as there was no probable cause
for the search and Mr. Gash posed no threat to the officers’ or anyone else’s safety. 30. Defendants John Doe, Jason Ambler, and John Doe #2, acting under color of state law, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, intentionally and/or recklessly caused the wrongful and unlawful arrest of Mr. Gash by relying solely on false, misleading, and malicious information provided by Defendant Cassidy, claiming that Mr. Gash posed an imminent threat to Individuals employed at Missouri Farm Bureau Federation. 31. The actions of all Defendants, acting individually and/or in concert, were wanton and malicious and subjected Mr. Gash to the unconstitutional and unreasonable search and seizure of his vehicle in violation of the Fourth Amendment. And the arrest of Mr. Gash without probable cause. The Defendants’ actions also deprived Mr. Gash of his right to due process and his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. 32. The actions of the Defendants proximately and directly caused Mr. Gash grievous permanent injury along with an attendant loss of liberty. Defendants’ actions also caused him severe mental pain, suffering, anguish and humiliation. 33. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendant John Doe was the agent, employee and servant of Defendant White, and Cole County Missouri, and was acting under the supervision of Defendant White. Jason Ambler was the agent, employee and servant of Defendant Schroeder, and The City of Jefferson City, Missouri, and was acting under the supervision of Defendant Schroeder. John Doe #2, was the agent, employee and servant of Defendant Keathley and the Missouri State Highway Patrol, and was acting under the supervision of Defendant Keathley. 34. Defendants White, and Cole County Missouri recklessly supervised Defendant John Doe, resulting in the illegal search and wrongful arrest and the consequent damages to Mr. Gash. Defendant Schroeder, and Defendant Jefferson City also recklessly failed to provide Defendant Jason Ambler with adequate training and supervision, resulting in the illegal search and wrongful arrest and the consequent damages to Mr. Gash. Defendant Keathley, and Defendant Missouri State Highway Patrol also recklessly failed to provide Defendant John Doe # 2 with adequate training and supervision, resulting in the illegal search and wrongful arrest and the consequent damages to Mr. Gash. The Defendants’ actions violated Gash’s rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Count II
Claim against All Defendants for Wrongful Arrest and Imprisonment in the Absence of Probable Cause, in Violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-34 and further states as follows: 35. The false and wrongful arrest and imprisonment of Mr. Gash without probable cause or reasonable cause that any law had been violated was deliberately and/or recklessly conducted or brought about by Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler, all acting under color of state law, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, they reached an understanding, acted in concert and engaged in a course of conduct together, and otherwise conspired among and between themselves to deprive Mr. Gash of his rights under the United States Constitution. 36. Defendants knew or should have known that they had no probable cause to seize and arrest Mr. Gash, or to cause his arrest, as Mr. Gash had committed no crime, but, rather, was the victim of the Defendants’ wanton, malicious and unconstitutional conduct. 37. The Defendants, acting individually and/or in concert with each other, unconstitutionally arrested and detained Mr. Gash, subjecting him to unreasonable seizure and arrest in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The
Defendants’ actions also deprived Mr. Gash of his right to due process and his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, all in violation of the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. 38. The actions of the Defendants proximately and directly caused Mr. Gash grievous permanent injury along with an attendant loss of liberty. Defendants’ actions also caused severe mental pain, suffering, anguish and humiliation. 39. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler were the agents, employees and servants of Defendants Cole County, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, and the City of Jefferson City, and were acting under the supervision of Defendants White, Keathley, and Schroeder. 40. Defendants White, Keathley, and Schroeder, recklessly supervised Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler, resulting in the illegal search and seizure of Mr. Gash’s vehicle, his wrongful arrest and the consequent damages. Defendants Cole County, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, and the City of Jefferson City also recklessly failed to provide Defendants John Doe, John Doe # 2, and Jason Ambler with adequate training and supervision, resulting in the wrongful arrest of Mr. Gash, the illegal search and seizure of his vehicle, and the consequent damages. The Defendants’ actions violated Mr. Gash’s rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Count III Claim for Conspiracy Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against all Defendants,
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-40 and further states as follows: 41. Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler under color of state law, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services , reached an understanding, acted in concert and engaged in a course of conduct together, and otherwise conspired among and between themselves to deprive Mr. Gash of his rights under the United States Constitution, and did deprive Mr. Gash of his right to be free from unlawful and unreasonable seizure and arrest and unlawful and unconstitutional detention. Defendants also deprived Mr. Gash of his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and his right not to be deprived of liberty unreasonably and without due process of law. The conspiracy violated Mr. Gash’s rights as protected by the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 42. Defendants conspired between and among themselves to subject Mr. Gash to unreasonable search and seizure, and wrongful arrest in the absence
of probable cause. Acting intentionally and/or recklessly, Defendants, along with others, violated the constitutional rights of Mr. Gash. 43. Defendants John Doe, John Doe # 2, and Jason Ambler along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services committed the overt acts set forth in this Count and in Counts I and II, which are hereby realleged. These acts include, but are not limited to, the unconstitutional search and seizure of Mr. Gash’s vehicle, seizing Mr. Gash unreasonably and illegally, and subjecting him to an unlawful and unconstitutional detention. All of these acts violated the constitutional rights of Mr. Gash. 44. The conspiratorial actions of the Defendants proximately and directly caused Mr. Gash grievous permanent injury along with an attendant loss of liberty. Defendants’ actions also caused severe mental pain, suffering, anguish and humiliation. Count IV
Monell Claim Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Against Defendant White, in his Official Capacity, and Cole County, Against Defendant Keathley, in his official capacity, and The Missouri State Highway Patrol, Against Defendant Schroeder, in his official capacity, and the City of Jefferson City Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1- 44 and further states as follows:
45. Sheriff White (a final policymaker for the Sheriff’s Department), Cole County, Superintendent Keathley, (a final policymaker for the Missouri State Highway Patrol), and Chief Schroeder, (a final policymaker for the Jefferson City Police Department), had in effect, both before and at the time of the events alleged in this Complaint, policies, practices, customs and procedures which operated to deprive Mr. Gash of his constitutional rights. 46. Sheriff White, Cole County, Superintendent Keathley, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Chief Schroeder, and Jefferson City Missouri are accountable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because they established policies and practices that were intended to and did encourage, endorse and permit their agents and employees to violate the constitutional rights of Mr. Gash, and other similarly situated persons. At a minimum, Sheriff White, Cole County, Superintendent Keathley, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Chief Schroeder, and Jefferson City were deliberately and/or recklessly indifferent to such constitutional violations. 47. The unconstitutional policies, practices, customs and procedures of Sheriff White, Cole County, Superintendent Keathley, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Chief Schroeder, and Jefferson City Missouri include, but are not limited to: A. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of failing to properly train and supervise officers to avoid the inappropriate use of police powers; B. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of failing to train and supervise officers in the techniques of properly conducting investigations; C. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of failing to train and supervise officers as to their obligation to truthfully report occurrences rather than to falsify information. D. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of covering up police misconduct by falsifying and fabricating evidence without regard to whether the policies, practices and customs might result in the unlawful arrest, prosecution or conviction of innocent persons; E. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of failing to discipline officers who violate the Constitution or law or otherwise transgress the rights of criminal suspects during their investigations; F. A policy, practice, custom or procedure of being deliberately indifferent to the violation by law enforcement officers of the rights of the accused; 48. Sheriff White, Cole County, Superintendent Keathley, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Chief Schroeder, and Jefferson City Missouri acquired and used the policies, practices, customs and procedures described above before and during the illegal vehicle search, arrest, investigation and prosecution of Mr. Gash. 49. These policies, practices, customs and procedures, as described above, were implemented intentionally and/or recklessly to deprive suspects and Defendants, including Mr. Gash, of his constitutional rights and were a direct and proximate cause of the Constitutional violations and injuries set forth in Counts I, II and III of this Complaint. Supplemental State Claims
50. With regard to the following State Claims, all Governmental Defendants were, at all material times, acting under Color of State Law and in their official capacities or as agents of law enforcement. The governmental entities and Sheriff White, Superintendent Keathley, and Chief Schroeder are liable as to all the State Claims listed under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Alternatively, with regard to intentional torts, the governmental entities, Cole County, Missouri State Highway Patrol, and Jefferson City Missouri are liable, along with Sheriff White, Superintendent Keathley, and Chief Schroeder for the failure to properly train and supervise employees, and or to establish appropriate policies, as described in Count IV. And with regard to the State Law Claims the corporate employee Defendants were acting as agents for The Missouri Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Bureau Insurance Services and the corporate Defendants are responsible for their actions under the doctrine of
respondeat superior.
Count V State Law Claim for False Arrest
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-50 and further states as follows: 51. Defendants Cole County, the City of Jefferson City, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, White, Schroeder, and Keathley acting through their agents, and Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services in concert each with the other, did willfully and unlawfully and under color of legal authority, illegally arrest and/or permit the illegal arrest and/or procure the arrest of Mr. Gash without legal excuse and detained him against his will without due and legal process. The arrest was directly and proximately caused by Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Bureau Insurance Services acting through its agents Charles Kruse and Daniel Cassidy providing, false, incomplete, or misleading information to the arresting authorities instigating and resulting in an illegal arrest. As a result of the false arrest, Mr. Gash was unlawfully detained, falsely imprisoned and caused to suffer great pain and emotional distress.
52. Mr. Gash suffered physical and mental pain and humiliation, and loss of freedom, companionship, and income. 53. The false arrest instigated by the Farm Bureau corporate Defendants was done maliciously, willfully, and recklessly at the direction of Defendants, justifying an award of punitive damages. Count VI State Law Claim for Abuse of Process
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-53 and further states as follows: 54. Defendants Cole County, the City of Jefferson City, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, White, Schroeder, and Keathley acting through their agents, and Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, acting in concert each with the other, did willfully, unlawfully, maliciously, and improperly use the Court’s process primarily for an ulterior, improper, and illegal purpose and, as a result of these actions and omissions, Plaintiff Gash did suffer great distress, pain, anguish, fear, and incurred monetary damages. The abuse of process
was directly and proximately caused by the failure of the governmental agencies and by the failure of Defendants White, Schroeder, and Keathley to provide adequate training, supervision and policies. The abuse of process was also caused by the Defendants Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Bureau Insurance Services misrepresenting the actions taken by the plaintiff on its property to instigate and procure the removal, arrest, and to prevent plaintiff from coming onto its property. 55. Because of the malicious, willful, reckless nature of Defendants’ actions, an award of punitive damages is justified. Count VII State Law Claim for Negligence Resulting in Wrongful Arrest and Detention
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-55 and further states as follows: 56. If Defendants White, Schroeder, and Keathley, acting through their agents, and Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler did not act intentionally, deliberately, and in bad faith, they did negligently bring about a wrongful arrest and detention of Plaintiff Gash and put together an unreliable case against him through negligent investigation, irresponsible procurement of evidence, and inadequate training, supervision and policies. The Defendant governmental entities as well as Defendant White, Keathley,
and Schroeder are responsible for this negligence under the doctrine of respondeat superior. The corporate Farm Bureau Defendants did either intentionally or negligently provide false information to the arresting authorities to encourage them to arrest Mr. Gash to keep him from coming onto its properties and to dissuade him from meeting with Charles Kruse and to have the vehicle with “FarmBureauLies.com” removed from the City of Jefferson City where interested members of the public could be exposed to the web site and might enter it to explore Farm Bureau’s practices. 57. All Defendants are responsible for negligence and causing the wrongful arrest and detention of Plaintiff Gash. 58. All Defendants owed Mr. Gash a duty of care, which included a duty to inquire into the correctness of the information received in their investigation. 59. The negligence in causing the illegal search, wrongful arrest, detention, and prosecution of Plaintiff Gash, despite the existence of evidence pointing towards Plaintiff’s lack of culpability and factual innocence, proximately and directly caused Mr. Gash to experience injuries, including extreme pain, suffering, fear, mental anguish, and loss of freedom and companionship. 60. Because the Defendants’ actions were malicious reckless and wanton, Plaintiff Gash is entitled to punitive damages.
Count VIII State Law Claim for Malicious Prosecution
Plaintiff Gash realleges the foregoing allegations in paragraphs 1-60 and further states as follows: 61. Defendants White, Schroeder, and Keathley acting through their agents, and Defendants John Doe, John Doe #2, and Jason Ambler, along with Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Charles Kruse, Daniel Cassidy, and Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance Services, acting in concert each with the other, without probable cause, did willfully, unlawfully, and maliciously cause Plaintiff Gash to be falsely accused. And a referral for prosecution in court was made and Mr. Gash was required to make a bond before his release pending prosecution. After the filing of a complaint and commencement of the prosecution of Plaintiff at the instigation of Defendants Farm Bureau Federation and Farm Bureau Insurance Service, Dan Cassidy and Charles Kruse, the prosecution was terminated in favor of plaintiff, there was want of probable cause for the prosecution, and the Defendant’s conduct was actuated by malice 62. All Defendants acting in concert one with the other fabricated evidence, suppressed evidence of innocence, and recklessly or deliberately
built a case based on inaccurate and misleading information, instigating the arrest without probable cause of the Plaintiff. 63. Because of this malicious activity, Plaintiff Gash suffered damages including great distress, pain, fear, anguish, suffering, and is entitled to monetary damages. Additionally, the malicious prosecution was directly and proximately caused by the failure of the governmental agencies and by the failure White, Schroeder, and Keathley to provide adequate training, supervision and policies. 64. Because of the malicious, willful, and reckless nature of Defendants’ actions, an award of punitive damages is justified. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
65. The actions of Defendants deprived Plaintiff Gash of his civil rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. 66. The intentional, malicious, and/or reckless actions or omissions of Defendants constituted the unlawful an unreasonable search and seizure, false or unlawful arrest, and illegal detention, all in violation of Mr. Gash’s constitutional rights. 67. The unlawful, intentional, malicious and/or reckless actions of Defendants caused Mr. Gash to suffer emotional stress, mental pain and
anguish, humiliation and continuing mental, and emotional injuries. Mr. Gash has incurred, and continues to incur, substantial expense to treat these injuries. 68. Defendants’ actions were deliberate, reckless, wanton, malicious and/or cruel, which justifies an award of punitive damages. 69. Defendants’ actions caused Mr. Gash to have to make a $500 cash bond, incur legal fees in defending the charges which were ultimately dismissed or not actually filed. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the following relief: 1. That this Court assume jurisdiction of this cause to determine this controversy and set this case for hearing on the merits; 2. The award of compensatory damages to Plaintiff Gash in the amount of $1,000,000.00. 3. The award of punitive damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1000.000.00. 4. That this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, allow the Plaintiff costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, and also grant such alternative relief as may seem to the Court, just, proper, and equitable.
JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as to all claims for damages. Respectfully submitted, _______S__________ J. Armin Rust #28156 108 N. College Richmond, MO 64085 (816) 776-6300 FAX (816) 776-6305 Attorney for Plaintiff October 27, 2008 All summons are now served to the thirteen defendants. The defendants answers to this suit will be posted as they are filed to the Court. November 27,2008 The State of Missouri has asked to be dismissed from the suit on the grounds that the State cannot be sued, only State employees can be sued. I believe that may be right so I may drop the State as a defendant and keep only the two employees, Mr. Keathley the Superintendant of the Highway Patrol, and the State Trooper who assisted with my arrest and searched my vehicle with out probable cause or warrants. A precious and valuable Constitutional right was taken away from me when Farm Bureaus CEO Daniel Cassidy made a false, misleading, and malicious police report accusing me of peace disturbance at their office in Jefferson City Mo. We all have a right as citizens of America to be free from unlawful arrest, and search of our homes, vehicles, and person without probable cause, and a warrant. September 28, 2009 Case is under settlement negotiations at this time. | |